所謂「構造機能主義」について復習。
http://www.anthrobase.com/Dic/eng/def/structural_functionalism.htm
あくまでも人類学の用語集なので、社会学における「構造機能主義」との関係は言及されていないですね。序でに「機能主義」*1は、
Structural functionalism was the dominating theoretical school in British social anthropology from about 1930 to 1960, and was originally formulated in opposition to evolutionism. Theoretically, structural functionalism rested on ideas from Durkheim; methodologically, it was based on long, intensive, "classical" fieldwork. But though the "father of fieldwork" was Malinowski, he did not see himself as a structural functionalist, but championed a less sociologically oriented, functionalist approach, with a stronger emphasis on the individual actor and greater suitability for studies of social change.Structural functionalist theory was formulated, in particular, by Radcliffe-Brown, but the most elegant and classical analyses in the genre are found in the work of Evans-Pritchard: See particularly his brilliant and (still) much debated monographs Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande and The Nuer. Structural functionalism and functionalism both took as their point of departure an idea of society as a holistic, integrated system, but structural functionalism had a much stronger emphasis on the self-perpetuation of the system. Indeed, the very name of the school implies that social institutions (which collectively form a social structure) function to maintain the harmony of the social whole.
Empirically, the structural functionalists were often preoccupied with political and economic issues, with an almost non-existant focus on meaning and symbolism. Kinship and lineage systems were a kind of Rosetta stone for their understanding of non-Western tribal societies, and became a model, at a very early stage, for how one might approach other kinds of social networks. Probably the most famous accomplishment of the structural functionalists was the formulation of segmentary lineage theory. (See also "process analysis" and structuralism.)
「機能主義」というのは「構造機能主義」よりも” less system-oriented”であり、”more oriented towards the individual”である。但し、ここでいう”system-oriented”というのは”holistic”と同義。
A theoretical orientation in anthropology, developed by Bronislaw Malinowski. Functionalism is similar to Radcliffe-Brown's structural functionalism, in that it is holistic and posits that all cultural "traits" are functionally interrelated and form an integrated social whole. But while structural functionalism stated (in Durkheim's spirit) that the function of the part was to maintain the whole, functionalism posited that all parts of society functioned to satisfy the individual's biological needs. Functionalism was thus a less system-oriented theory than structural functionalism and more oriented towards the individual. It was also more open toward social change. Thus, although functionalism was largely eclipsed by structural functionalism in British anthropology after 1930, it experienced a resurgence when structural functionalism was attacked (largely for lacking any means of conceptualizing social change) by the methodological individualists of the 1950's. Aside from Malinowski, his students Raymond Firth and Audrey Richards were the most prominent practitioners of functionalism. Edmund Leach was also originally a functionalist.
なお、http://d.hatena.ne.jp/sumita-m/20060502/1146551271で言及したhttp://www.anthrobase.com/Dic/eng/pers/mauss_marcel.htmから、レヴィ＝ストロースによるモース『社会学と人類学』序文*2がリンクされている。
