Via https://nessko.hatenadiary.jp/entry/2019/05/07/200348
Alex Krasodomski-Jones “Why Blocking Hate Sites Like 8chan May Only Make Them Stronger” http://time.com/5581701/should-we-block-hate-sites/
新西蘭のクライストチャーチでモスクを襲撃し虐殺を行なったBrenton Tarrantは匿名掲示板サイト8chanに犯行予告を書き込んでいた。クライストチャーチ虐殺事件*1以降、濠太剌利の幾つかのISPでは8chanへの接続をブロックしており、facebookも8chanへのリンクを禁止し始めた。しかし、こういう措置は短期的には効果があるかも知れないが長期的には無駄であるという。
ネットの中和化作用；
Blocking access to these platforms would validate users’ long-running narrative that the mainstream simply can’t deal with their edginess. For instance, 8chan has been blamed at various times for the spread of extremist bloodshed, campaigns of harassment and generally being a hotbed of hate. The site hosts content that is illegal in several countries, and many of its users encouraged and delighted in the acts of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic violence–amid chats on gaming, fitness and anime.
鼬ごっこ；
8chan’s users are well aware of its infamy and association with all the Establishment finds intolerable, from offensive jokes to extremist politics. Much of the content is designed to shock–and laugh at who’s offended. The Christchurch and Poway shooters’ manifestos, posted to the site before the killings started, are strewn with in-jokes, trolling and red herrings–with the twin aims of winking to the community and misleading unwitting, horrified journalists. It is deliberate provocation: search interest in 8chan spiked after the Christchurch massacre, no doubt because of the many articles published about it afterward.
技術的困難；
Trying to knock out fringe sites will also create a never-ending game of whack-a-mole. 8chan itself was set up as a “free-speech-friendly” alternative to 4chan, which itself grew after Reddit banned several controversial sections. And consider ISIS propaganda, which after years of pressure from governments, social-media companies and security services is only marginally harder to find these days and clearly still reaches enough people to inspire harm. Besides, much of the far-right content originating on sites like 8chan is already everywhere, including on the biggest platforms on the web–YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Google–as well as thousands of other message boards and hosting platforms. 8chan may be among the worst, but it is not alone.The Myopic focus on eliminating hateful content from the Internet fundamentally misses that it is the community–not the content–that drives radicalization. These sites are filled with their own icons, language and culture. On 8chan, the Christchurch killer has been branded a “saint,” and the Norwegian terrorist who killed 77 people in 2011 has been too. The most important thing these sites offer a would-be gunman is companionship, recognition and, ultimately, an audience to impress. It’s the desire for this sense of belonging that deserves far more of our focus.
Only a select few platforms can afford the investment in technology and manpower needed to hide hate online: building algorithms that efficiently spot extremist propaganda; hiring exponentially more moderators to quickly remove content; doing more than the self-congratulatory bean counting of the posts scrubbed from one platform, only to leave the content readily findable elsewhere. For smaller forums like 8chan, doing this would be impossible.
